许士春,张文文

• 1:中国矿业大学管理学院

摘要(Abstract)：

本文构建了多部门递归动态可计算一般均衡模型,考虑中国经济发展和碳减排的现实情况,以征收40元/吨碳税且无税收返还为基准情景,分析了碳税对中国经济和碳强度的影响;在此基础上,本文探讨六种税收返还情景(返还清洁能源部门部分碳税、返还服务业部分碳税、返还农村和城镇居民全部碳税、减免企业所得税、减免居民所得税、减免生产税)对碳税负效应的缓解作用,同时探讨税收返还政策下碳税对中国经济增长、社会福利、农村和城镇居民收入消费、各部门产出的影响差异,并从实现2020年和2030年减排目标的角度,比较不同返还情景下碳税对碳排放量、碳强度,以及对非化石能源占一次能源消费结构变化的长期影响。研究结果表明:基准情景下,碳税对经济确实存在负效应;六种返还政策均不同程度地降低碳税负效应,同时也能够保证实现2020年的减排目标且有利于实现2030年的目标;对单一部门(清洁能源部门或服务业)部分返还碳税能够促进相应部门的产出,但力度较小,与其他政策相比影响微弱,但都能够有效地促进这两大部门的发展,因此在制定补贴政策时应当考虑行业差异性,重点扶持符合绿色发展要求的行业;对农村和城镇居民的直接返还均能增加农村和城镇居民收入,刺激了消费进而带动社会经济发展,相比部门返还政策,这一政策更为有效的提高了社会福利,但也会进一步拉大农村与城镇居民之间的收入消费差距;减免企业所得税促进企业投资和产业结构调整;减免居民所得税极大的刺激居民消费;减免生产税促进进口、拉动就业率,降低化石能源部门产出,综合来看,相对于其他返还政策,减免生产税更有效可行。

关键词(KeyWords)： 碳税;动态CGE模型;税收返还;减排目标

Abstract:

Keywords:

基金项目(Foundation): 国家自然科学基金面上项目“福利视角下碳税政策建模与实证研究”(批准号:71573253);; 中央基本科研业务费(批准号:2013W03);; 中国博士后特别资助项目(批准号:2015T80594)

作者(Author): 许士春,张文文

参考文献(References)：

• [1]WHALLEY J,WIGLE R.Results for the OECD comparative modeling project from the Whalley-Wigle Model[R].OECD Economics Department Working Papers.OECD Publishing,1992.
• [2]WHALLEY J,WIGLE R.Cutting CO2emissions:the effect of alternative policy approaches[J].The energy journal,1991,12(1):109-124.
• [3]O’RYAN R,MIGUEL C J D,MILLER S,et al.Computable general equilibrium model analysis of economy wide cross effects of social and environmental policies in Chile[J].Ecological economics,2005,54(4):447-472.
• [4]WISSEMA W,DELLINK R.AGE analysis of the impact of a carbon energy tax on the Irish economy[J].Ecological economics,2007,61(4):671-683.
• [5]ALLAN G,LECCA P,MCGREGOR P,et al.The economic and environmental impact of a carbon tax for Scotland:a computable general equilibrium analysis[J].Ecological economics,2014,100(100):40-50.
• [6]BURNIAUX J M,NICOLETTI G,OLIIVIRA J.GREEN:a global model for quantifying the costs of policies to curb CO2emissions[J].OECD economic studies,1992(19):39-72.
• [7]AASNESS J,BYE T,MYSEN H T.Welfare effects of emissions taxes in Norway[J].Energy economics,1996,18(4):335-346.
• [8]BUREAU B.Distributional effects of a carbon tax on car fuels in France[J].Energy economics,2011,33(1):121-130.
• [9]ORLOV A,GRETHE H,MCDONALD S.Carbon taxation in Russia:prospects for a double dividend and improved energy efficiency[J].Energy economics,2013,37(1):128-140.
• [10]WENDNER R.An applied dynamic general equilibrium model of environmental tax reforms and pension policy[J].Joural of policy modeling,2001,23(1):25-50.
• [11]贺菊煌,沈可挺,徐嵩龄.碳税与二氧化碳减排的CGE模型[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2002(10):39-47.[HE Juhuang,SHEN Keting,XU Songling.CGE model of carbon tax and carbon emissions reduction[J].The journal of quantitative&technical economics,2002(10):39-47.]
• [12]魏涛远,格罗姆斯洛德.征收碳税对中国经济与温室气体排放的影响[J].世界经济与政治,2002(8):47-49.[WEI Taoyuan,GLOMSROD S.The impacts of carbon taxes on China’s economy and carbon emissions[J].World economics and politics,2002(8):47-49.]
• [13]郭正权,刘海滨,牛东晓.基于CGE模型的我国碳税政策对二氧化碳排放影响的模拟分析[J].煤炭工程.2012(1):138-140.[GUO Zhengquan,LIU Haibin,NIU Dongxiao.Simulation analysis on China carbon tax policy affected to energy and carbon dioxide emission base on CGE model[J].Coal engineering,2012(1):138-140.]
• [14]高鹏飞,陈文颖.碳税与碳排放[J].清华大学学报:自然科学版,2002,42(10):1335-1338.[GAO Pengfei,CHEN Wenying.Carbon tax and carbon emission[J].Journal of Tsinghua University(science and technology),2002,42(10):1335-1338.]
• [15]张景华.碳税的就业“双重红利”效应研究[J].生态经济,2013(7):47-50.[ZHANG Jinghua.Research on employment double dividend effects of carbon tax[J].Ecological economy,2013(7):47-50.]
• [16]朱永彬,刘晓,王铮.碳税政策的减排效果及其对我国经济的影响分析[J].中国软科学.2010(4):1-9.[ZHU Yongbin,LIU Xiao,WANG Zheng.Abatement effect of carbon tax and its impacts on economy in China[J].China soft science,2010(4):1-9.]
• [17]石敏俊,袁永娜,周晟吕,等.碳减排政策:碳税、碳交易还是两者兼之?[J].管理科学学报,2013,16(9):9-19.[SHI Minjun,YUAN Yongna,ZHOU Shenglv,et al.Carbon tax,capand-trade or mixed policy:which is better for carbon mitigation?[J].Journal of management sciences in China,2013,16(9):9-19.]
• [18]王灿,陈吉宁,邹骥.基于CGE模型的CO2减排对中国经济的影响[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版).2005,45(12):1621-1624.[WANG Can,CHEN Jining,ZOU Ji.Impact assessment of CO2mitigation on China economy based on a CGE model[J].Journal of Tsinghua University(science and technology),2005,45(12):1621-1624.]
• [19]刘多多.碳税政策对内蒙古经济与环境的影响分析[D].呼和浩特:内蒙古工业大学,2013.[LIU Duoduo.Analysis of the impact of carbon tax policy on the Inner Mongolia economy and the environment[D].Hohhot:Inner Mongolia University of Technology,2013.]
• [20]梁伟.基于CGE模型的环境税“双重红利”研究——山东省为例[D].天津:天津大学,2013.[LIANG Wei.Study of double dividend of environmental tax based on CGE model:a case study of Shandong Province[D].Tianjin:Tianjin University,2013.]
• [21]周晟吕,石敏俊,李娜,等.碳税政策的减排效果与经济影响[J].气候变化研究进展,2011,7(3):210-216.[ZHOU Shenglv,SHI Minjun,LI Na,et al.Impacts of carbon tax policy on CO2mitigation and economic growth in China[J].Advances in climate change research,2011,7(3):210-216.]
• [22]胡宗义,刘静,刘亦文.不同税收返还机制下碳税征收的一般均衡分析[J].中国软科学,2011(9):55-64.[HU Zongyi,LIU Jing,LIU Yiwen.General equilibrium analysis of carbon tax under different tax return mechanisms[J].China soft science,2011(9):55-64.]
• [23]刘宇,肖宏伟,吕郢康.多种税收返还模式下碳税对中国的经济影响——基于动态CGE模型[J].财经研究,2015,41(1):35-48.[LIU Yu,XIAO Hongwei,LV Yingkang.On economic effect of carbon taxes in China under several tax relief modes:based on dynamic CGE model[J].Journal of finance and economics,2015,41(1):35-48.]
• [24]HOSOE N,GASAWA K,HASHIMOTO H.Textbook of computable general equilibrium modeling:programming and simulations[M].2nd Edition.Tokyo:University of Tokyo Press,2011.
• [25]娄峰.中国经济—能源—环境—税收动态可计算一般均衡模型理论及应用[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2015.[LOU Feng.The theory and application of Chinese economy-energyenvironment-tax dynamic computable general equilibrium model[M].Beijing:China Social Sciences Press,2015.]
• [26]娄峰.碳税征收对我国宏观经济及碳减排影响的模拟研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2014(10):84-109.[LOU Feng.Simulation study on the carbon tax impact on China’s macro economy and carbon emission reduction[J].The journal of quantitative&technical economics,2014(10):84-109.]
• [27]许士春,张文文,戴利俊.基于CGE模型的碳税政策对碳排放及居民福利的影响分析[J].工业技术经济,2016,35(5):52-59.[XU Shichun,ZHANG Wenwen,DAI Lijun.Impact assessment of CGE:based carbon tax on carbon emission reduction and resident welfare[J].Journal of industrial technological economics,2016,35(5):52-59.]
• (1)Hosoe等的动态CGE模型是根据日本2005年投入产出表构建的,主要包括四个部门、两个要素、居民、政府和国外等简单账户。本文结合中国的现实经济情况,对此模型进行了相应拓展。